This web log is meant to chronicle my "Live From the Field" expedition with Earthwatch. I hope to learn about forest research methods while I make a contribution to the study of climate change.

Monday, December 8, 2008

UPDATED - Scientific Orientation





After breakfast, we had the great opportunity to hear about climate change, evidence, and possible responses and actions from Bert Drake, a well respected climate scientist whose training in in plant physiology. His curriculum vitae (fancy academic language for resume) can be found at http://www.serc.si.edu/people/resumes/drake_cv.htm. Note that he got his MS at CSU, which also happens to be a major center for climate modeling. He thinks that he'd like to come to our school to make his presentation to you if we can come up with airfare and a lift ticket.

We then heard from Jeff Lombardo, who was standing in for the senior scientist for out study. The senior scientist is named Jess Parker. His web site can be found at http://www.serc.si.edu/labs/forest_ecology/index.jsp. We have already met many of the permanent staff, who are listed on the "People and Contacts" page, which is accessible in the left column of that page. Jeff told us a lot more about what we'll be doing, which is pretty cool--actually pretty darned cold today.

On this chilly morning, we went out into the field with Nancy Kahn for orientation. The forest is full of poison ivy and nasty, invasive rose bushes, I already lost one battle against a rose bush, but I hope to do better. In the picture, the hairy-rooted vine is poison ivy. We went to see one of the studied plots so that we could understand what we are going to be doing. Mostly, we'll be identifying trees, vines, and shrubs, measuring them, describing the amount of sunlight available to them, and mapping them. Then we'll tag them with unique number plates so that in future years researchers will be able to examine what has happened. Click on the photo of the tree with ivy; in it, you can see that the tree and the ivy have had identifying tags nailed onto them. Because the poison ivy is over 1 cm DBH (diameter at breast height), even it must be tagged and mapped. Dangerous business, since the oils can get on the skin and cause a reaction, even in the winter. On the positive side, at least the ticks seem to be dead or inactive...






Analysis of the data should yield a plot like the one shown here. It will contain loads of information. We hope to provide baseline data for about 1/3 of a hectare to complete the current plot. In a way, each plotted area is a quadrat study--like an advanced version of our square meter of turf. They tell us that this study has been funded by HSBC to the tune of 100 million dollars. I'll try to confirm that number soon. Meanwhile, I'll leave you with this map of the plots being examined at SERC. Tomorrow the weather will be better, so we'll try to work like crazy to get done before the rain on Wednesday. We also hope to climb above the canopy on a research platform to get a good view of the property. The tower is shown on the map. Also shown are stumps from logged areas. One of the concepts under consideration is the effect of logging on biodiversity, population dynamics, and efficacy of carbon sequestration (as evidenced by accumulated biomass). I'll provide more details as I receive them!

6 Comments:

At December 8, 2008 9:23 PM , Blogger Max Churchfield said...

I am definitely thinking that the stripe with the lack of dots on the distribution plot is either a trail or a small stream. Also, it is interesting to note the space between each tree and how it sometimes reflects how large each treee is and how competitive they are with their own species and with other species for water/nutrients and light.

 
At December 9, 2008 8:55 AM , Anonymous Evan-o L! said...

Are there any similar destructive insects like pine-beetles in a deciduous forest, or is there a major disease that effects many of the trees there? What challenges to deciduous forests face that wouldn't effect the types of trees that we have here?

 
At December 9, 2008 4:13 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Comment 1:
It may be cold there but at least you do not have to deal with snow. This morning (Tues.) school was delayed a half hour (worthless)due to it. However, on a scientific topic, I am interested in the poison ivy you discussed. I have never seen it grow to that size and I have been to the deciduous forests on the East Coast multiple times. Also, the analysis that your team is using for the hectacre reminds me of that which we used for our biodiversity analysis. Good luck. Andrew Morton Period 8.

 
At December 10, 2008 8:25 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

1) In analyzing the distribution plot, it appears, as Max mentioned, that there is a natural gap (such as a river) which impedes growth near the North of the plot. Over time, as diseases attack the flora, will certain “natural” patterns form? If so, will this be a result of certain tree species and their susceptibility to disease? Or will it be a combination of this but also their proximity to this “river?” How about as it relates to altitude?
2) As the goal of this project is to establish a benchmark for certain metrics (distribution, access to light, etc.) of trees, but also vines and shrubs, what is the hypothesis for what a scientist 100 years from now might see? In concurrence with global warming, what effects do you (Dr. D) or the other scientists foresee? And in what time frame?

Also, I can empathize with the rose bush. I once hiked two miles through rose bushes. It was fun…until I entered the Dead Sea the next day.

Jordan Meer P.6

 
At December 10, 2008 10:20 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

It seems almost as if the ironwood and the beech, though both seem to be majority species, are competing for similar conditions. Both seem to be intermingled in clumped groupings in the same areas of the plot, whether it be for water supply, sunlight or better soil, it would be hard to tell. Andy Greos p3

 
At December 11, 2008 9:44 PM , Anonymous Katie Keller said...

Wow it looks a lot like that we had been doing in class, but a little more accurate! Are you just identifying plants or animals as well? Also, what will the scientists be looking for in a couple months when they they look at the trees you tagged? Good luck! Katie Keller p3

 

Post a Comment

<< Home